Abstract

The United Nations formulated the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in 2015 as a comprehensive global policy framework for addressing the most pressing social and environmental challenges currently facing humanity. In this paper, we analyse SDG 12, which aims to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.” Despite long-standing political recognition of this objective, and ample scientific evidence both on its importance and on the efficacy of various ways of promoting it, the SDGs do not provide clear goals or effective guidance on how to accomplish this urgently needed transformation. Drawing from the growing body of research on sustainable consumption and production (SCP), the paper identifies two dominant vantage points—one focused on promoting more efficient production methods and products (mainly through technological improvement and informed consumer choice) and the other stressing the need to consider also overall volumes of consumption, distributional issues, and related social and institutional changes. We label these two approaches efficiency and systemic. Research shows that while the efficiency approach contains essential elements of a transition to sustainability, it is by itself highly unlikely to bring about sustainable outcomes. Concomitantly, research also finds that volumes of consumption and production are closely associated with environmental impacts, indicating a need to curtail these volumes in ways that safeguard social sustainability, which is unlikely to be possible without a restructuring of existing socioeconomic arrangements. Analysing how these two perspectives are reflected in the SDGs framework, we find that in its current conception, it mainly relies on the efficiency approach. On the basis of this assessment, we conclude that the SDGs represent a partial and inadequate conceptualisation of SCP which will hamper implementation. Based on this determination, this paper provides some suggestions on how governments and other actors involved in SDGs operationalisation could more effectively pursue SCP from a systemic standpoint and use the transformation of systems of consumption and production as a lever for achieving multiple sustainability objectives.

Highlights

  • The United Nations formulated the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in 2015 as a comprehensive global policy framework for addressing the most pressing social and environmental challenges currently facing humanity

  • The main finding of this assessment is the substantial gap that exists between current scientific understanding of sustainable consumption and production (SCP) and how this field is articulated in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs

  • We find that the need for substantial changes in patterns of consumption and production is well reflected at the headline level of the Agenda, while the specific targets and indicators of the SDG 12 on SCP provide a partial and inadequate conceptualisation of such transformations and do not reflect current scientific knowledge

Read more

Summary

The overall framing of sustainable consumption and production

While the 2030 Agenda does not include an explicit definition of SCP, the introductory sections of the agreement provide some indications. It is somewhat ironic that wealthy countries with superior scientific and technological capacity have far higher per-capita environmental impacts than developing nations This indicates that technological prowess as such does not ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns, but can have the opposite effect. Given their role as enablers for other targets, it would make sense to ensure that good progress is made in these areas in the early phases of implementation To summarise this appraisal of SDG 12, 3 of the 11 targets mainly confirm earlier agreements or recognise existing initiatives (the 10YFP, SAICM on sound chemicals management, and the G20 agreement on fossil-fuel subsidies). In some cases, such as with waste reduction and sound waste management, the indicators do not even reflect the most salient aspects of the targets as such and are not even useful as proxies

SCP in other sustainable development goals
Curtailed paid labour
Good quality public services
Spurring health benefits
Moving sustainable consumption up the political agenda
Conclusions and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call