Abstract
AbstractFor the description of the flow processes of an adhesive during pressing, existing CFD models are very complex and should be replaced by more efficient methods. The Partially Filled Gap (PFG) model developed for tribological systems, which is firmly established in practice, is used for this purpose. This paper shows an academic example of a comparison between a CFD calculation, the PFG model and an analytical solution based on the Reynolds equation, showing that the PFG method is well suitable to the problem presented. In an outlook the future potential of this approach is discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
