Abstract

In the article on the example of two states, the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of India, the forms and methods of implementing the changes in the policy of memory in recent decades have beenexamined, their directions have been revealed, their positive and negative impact on society has been analyzed. It is shown that the policy of historical memory strongly correlates with the politicaldiscourse of the country, but increasingly responds to external challenges. Changes in the policy of memory mean changes in the semantic organization of the country’s space. At the same time, broadpolitical, cultural and, accordingly, memorial pluralism is not a guarantee of social harmony. Important components of the experience of implementing the policy of memory in these countries have been established, they can be taken into account in the development of the corresponding direction of the state policy of Ukraine.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call