Abstract

Sensory signals undergo substantial recoding when neural activity is relayed from sensors through pre-thalamic and thalamic nuclei to cortex. To explore how temporal dynamics and directional tuning are sculpted in hierarchical vestibular circuits, we compared responses of macaque otolith afferents with neurons in the vestibular and cerebellar nuclei, as well as five cortical areas, to identical three-dimensional translational motion. We demonstrate a remarkable spatio-temporal transformation: otolith afferents carry spatially aligned cosine-tuned translational acceleration and jerk signals. In contrast, brainstem and cerebellar neurons exhibit non-linear, mixed selectivity for translational velocity, acceleration, jerk and position. Furthermore, these components often show dissimilar spatial tuning. Moderate further transformation of translation signals occurs in the cortex, such that similar spatio-temporal properties are found in multiple cortical areas. These results suggest that the first synapse represents a key processing element in vestibular pathways, robustly shaping how self-motion is represented in central vestibular circuits and cortical areas.

Highlights

  • Many sensory systems have been studied along their hierarchy, from primary receptor cells to cortical neurons

  • We considered only cells with significant spatial and temporal response modulation, as detailed by Chen et al (2011a). This inclusion criterion yielded a total of 27 otolith afferents (OA), 49 vestibular nuclei (VN) cells, 61 CN cells, 115 parietoinsular vestibular cortex (PIVC)

  • In its most general form, the standard model consisted of the sum of three response components, having temporal dynamics associated with velocity, acceleration and jerk

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many sensory systems have been studied along their hierarchy, from primary receptor cells to cortical neurons. Such systematic analyses provide a foundation for comprehending the neural computations that convert early sensory activity into higher level constructs that underlie perception, action, and other cognitive functions. How do the spatial and temporal properties of neurons in cortical areas differ from those in subcortical vestibular hubs?. Neural response properties in the vestibular nuclei (VN), which receive the bulk of vestibular afferent projections outside the cerebellum (Barmack, 2003; Newlands and Perachio, 2003; Angelaki and Cullen, 2008), are different

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call