Abstract

BackgroundIf transformation from persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to paroxysmal AF after catheter ablation had impacts on the outcome of repeated ablation was unclear. This study aimed to explore whether the type of recurrent AF after ablation for persistent AF was associated with recurrence after repeated ablation. Methods and resultsThis was a retrospective cohort study. 116 persistent AF patients undergoing the second ablation due to a failed initial ablation were enrolled in our study. Patients with recurrent paroxysmal AF after initial ablation were categorized as Group A (47 patients) while those with recurrent persistent AF were categorized as Group B (69 patients). The study endpoint was defined as any episode of AF, atrial tachyarrhythmia or atrial flutter lasting for >30 s, after the 3 month blanking period following repeated procedure. After 3–72 months (median: 24 months) of follow-up from repeated ablation, 54 (47%) patients suffered from recurrence after repeated ablation. In univariate analyses, Group B suffered a higher risk for recurrence than those in Group A (hazard ratio: 2.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.14–3.70, P = 0.01). Besides recurrent AF type, larger left atrial dimension at repeated procedure and pulmonary vein reconnection also predicted success of repeated ablation. In multivariate analysis, patients in Group B still had a 1.91-fold higher risk for recurrence than those in Group A (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.06–3.44, P = 0.03). ConclusionsAfter persistent AF ablation, transformation from persistent AF to paroxysmal AF is independently associated with success of repeat ablation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.