Abstract

Two Pavlovian appetitive conditioning experiments with rats assessed extinction cue (EC) transfer using spontaneous recovery tests. In each experiment, after conditioned stimulus (CS) A-US pairings, an EC (X) was presented during A-extinction, followed by spontaneous recovery testing with A. Experiment 1 tested for transfer between ECs; the additional CS (B) was conditioned and then was extinguished with a second EC (Y). CS A was tested with X and with Y (the possible transfer EC). Experiment 2 tested for transfer between an EC and an explicitly trained serial negative occasion setter (OS). Prior to testing with A, Y was trained in a serial Y→C-, C + discrimination; a Z→B-, B + discrimination was also trained. A was tested with X and with Y (with Y as the possible transfer OS). X and Y were also tested with B (where X with B tests possible EC-OS transfer). In each experiment Y did not reduce spontaneous recovery to A, showing no transfer of one EC to another (Experiment 1) and no transfer of a serial negative OS to a CS (A) extinguished with an EC (X; Experiment 2). X did not reduce responding to B, showing no transfer of an EC to the target CS of a serial negative OS discrimination, although Y did transfer to B (Experiment 2) showing transfer between serial OSs. X did reduce responding to the CS (A) it had occurred with during extinction (Experiments 1 and 2). The results are discussed in terms of EC characteristics and regarding theories of an EC’s possible mechanisms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call