Abstract
In this article, the author considers how BEPS Actions 8, 9, 10 and 13 impact upon Korea’s transfer pricing law and practice. The article examines existing Korean transfer pricing legislation and case law, and focuses on the arm’s length principle and risks, intangibles, low value-adding intra-group services and cost contribution arrangements, from a Korean perspective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
