Abstract

The quest to ensure that the tax planning activities of multinational enterprises operating in Nigeria do not erode the country's domestic tax base has led to the enactment and enforcement of the Transfer Pricing (TP) Regulations, 2018 in Nigeria. The TP Regulation provides for a comprehensive framework to ensure that the pricing of related party transactions is consistent with global best practices on TP. The enforcement of the TP Regulation in Nigeria was taken a step further in 2020 when the Tax Appeal Tribunal affirmed the imposition by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) of liability of over one billion naira on Prime Plastichem Nigeria Limited for failing to apply consistent TP methods in the financial years 2013 and 2014. While this decision was hailed as Nigeria's first decision of the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) dealing with transfer pricing, the decision has been criticised for failing to apply the global standards for TP documentation. This article seeks to critique the principles of TP documentation espoused in the Prime Plastichem case vis-à-vis international best practices on transfer pricing documentation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.