Abstract

Tactile learning transfers from trained to untrained fingers in a pattern that reflects overlap between the representations of fingers in the somatosensory system (e.g., neurons with multifinger receptive fields). While physical proximity on the body is known to determine the topography of somatosensory representations, tactile coactivation is also an established organizing principle of somatosensory topography. In this study we investigated whether tactile coactivation, induced by habitual inter-finger cooperative use (use pattern), shapes inter-finger overlap. To this end, we used psychophysics to compare the transfer of tactile learning from the middle finger to its adjacent fingers. This allowed us to compare transfer to two fingers that are both physically and cortically adjacent to the middle finger but have differing use patterns. Specifically, the middle finger is used more frequently with the ring than with the index finger. We predicted this should lead to greater representational overlap between the former than the latter pair. Furthermore, this difference in overlap should be reflected in differential learning transfer from the middle to index vs. ring fingers. Subsequently, we predicted temporary learning-related changes in the middle finger's representation (e.g., cortical magnification) would cause transient interference in perceptual thresholds of the ring, but not the index, finger. Supporting this, longitudinal analysis revealed a divergence where learning transfer was fast to the index finger but relatively delayed to the ring finger. Our results support the theory that tactile coactivation patterns between digits affect their topographic relationships. Our findings emphasize how action shapes perception and somatosensory organization.

Highlights

  • HISTORICALLY, INVALUABLE INSIGHTS regarding the neural architecture of the somatosensory system and primary somatosensory cortex (SI) have been achieved using electrophysiological studies in nonhuman primates

  • Given the documented differences in individualized finger movements in monkeys and humans and the limitations in elucidating receptive fields (RFs) properties in humans, it is not yet possible to speculate which the cytoarchitectonic division(s) would have the topography required to underpin the results reported in this study; such knowledge may soon be afforded in humans by functional magnetic resonance imaging protocols capable of mapping overlap between the fingers in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex

  • We cannot directly rule out the possibility that divergent learning in the trained hand might be somewhat affected by a different capacity for learning between the fingers, together these findings argue against this possibility. We suggest that this pattern likely reflects differing levels of overlap between somatosensory finger representations resulting from tactile coactivation during action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HISTORICALLY, INVALUABLE INSIGHTS regarding the neural architecture of the somatosensory system and primary somatosensory cortex (SI) have been achieved using electrophysiological studies in nonhuman primates. Www.jn.org ment of fingers (syndactyly: Clark et al 1988; see Allard et al 1991), repetitive co-stimulation across adjacent fingers (Wang et al 1995) or single fingers (Jenkins et al 1990; Recanzone et al 1992a, 1992b), and following highly stereotypic movements with subsequent repetitive tactile inputs (Byl et al 1996; Sterr et al 1998). These synergies, which result from musculoskeletal as well as neural constraints (Lang and Schieber 2004; Reilly and Schieber 2003; Soechting and Flanders 1997), simplify motor control by reducing the degrees of freedom of the hand (Tresch et al 2006)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call