Abstract

Physical cognition has generally been assessed in tool-using species that possess a relatively large brain size, such as corvids and apes. Parrots, like corvids and apes, also have large relative brain sizes, yet although parrots rarely use tools in the wild, growing evidence suggests comparable performances on physical cognition tasks. It is, however, unclear whether success on such tasks is facilitated by previous experience and training procedures. We therefore investigated physical comprehension of object relationships in two non-tool-using species of captive neotropical parrots on a new means-end paradigm, the Trap-Gaps task, using unfamiliar materials and modified training procedures that precluded procedural cues. Red-shouldered macaws (Diopsittaca nobilis) and black-headed caiques (Pionites melanocephala) were presented with an initial task that required them to discriminate between pulling food trays through gaps while attending to the respective width of the gaps and size of the trays. Subjects were then presented with a novel, but functionally equivalent, transfer task. Six of eight birds solved the initial task through trial-and-error learning. Four of these six birds solved the transfer task, with one caique demonstrating spontaneous comprehension. These findings suggest that non-tool-using parrots may possess capacities for sophisticated physical cognition by generalising previously learned rules across novel problems.

Highlights

  • The comprehension of object relationships has typically been assessed using both vertical string-pulling and horizontal means-end problems

  • We investigate whether two species of nontool-using parrots show capacities for physical cognition when tested on a means-end problem that lacks similar perceptual cues experienced during training

  • While all subjects learned to discriminate rewarded from unrewarded trays during the training phase, of the eight subjects tested, three macaws and three caiques learned to solve their initial presentation of the Trap-Gaps task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The comprehension of object relationships has typically been assessed using both vertical string-pulling and horizontal means-end problems. Vertical string-pulling tasks typically require subjects to discriminate between strings that are either connected, or disconnected, to an otherwise out-of-reach reward. Horizontal means-end discrimination tasks, by contrast, are often used to assess physical cognition in primates, typically by presenting subjects with a binary choice between a functional and a non-functional tool or a platform, with rewards placed at the distal ends of each option (Hauser et al 1999; Povinelli 2000; Yamazaki et al 2011). A variety of species, such as dogs

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call