Abstract

To test the effects of obstructed and unobstructed imprinting approach on subsequent instrumental responding, four groups of domestic chicks, in two separate replications, received imprinting or control treatment during the first week of life and later acquired a food-motivated running response in a runway for continuous reward. Runway acquisition results revealed no significant differences between imprinting (IM), imprinting/shock (IS), shock control (SK), and handling control (CN) Ss. However, significantly different patterns of persistence across groups and replications were evident during runway extinction. Results are explained in terms of a counterconditioning notion of response persistence.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.