Abstract
Objective Since different techniques have been described for cholangiogram access after liver transplantation, we compared two different methods for patients with duct-to-duct biliary anastomoses. Methods Adult liver transplant patients from program inception in 1993 to May 2003 in whom a duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis with a T-tube choledochostomy were compared with those having a transcystic duct catheter using a rubber band. We excluded 10 patients in which a different technique was used or graft or patient survived less than 21 days. Group A ( n = 28,) had a number 10 T-tube exteriorized through the recipient main bile duct; and group B ( n = 33) a number 5 Bard ureteral stent tied to the cystic stump with reabsorbable suture and secured with a hemorrhoidal rubber ligature. Results The biliary complication rate was lower among the transcystic catheter group (9.1%, 3/33) compared to the T-tube group (35.7%, 10/28). Postcatheter withdrawal peritonitis was present in two patients in the T-tube group, one of whom required emergency laparotomy. A satisfactory postoperative cholangiogram was obtained in both groups. The transcystic catheter was withdrawn on average at 29 days, compared to 136 days in the T-tube group. Conclusions Both techniques are equally effective in obtaining a satisfactory postoperative cholangiogram. However, the transcystic catheter technique allows a significantly earlier withdrawal with fewer complications compared to the T-tube technique.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have