Abstract

Despite the widespread use of antiseptics such as chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) in dental practice and oral care, the risks of potential resistance toward these antimicrobial compounds in oral bacteria have only been highlighted very recently. Since the molecular mechanisms behind antiseptic resistance or adaptation are not entirely clear and the bacterial stress response has not been investigated systematically so far, the aim of the present study was to investigate the transcriptomic stress response in Streptococcus mutans after treatment with CHX using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Planktonic cultures of stationary-phase S. mutans were treated with a sublethal dose of CHX (125 µg/mL) for 5 min. After treatment, RNA was extracted, and RNA-seq was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed and validated by qRT-PCR. Analysis of differential gene expression following pathway analysis revealed a considerable number of genes and pathways significantly up- or downregulated in S. mutans after sublethal treatment with CHX. In summary, the expression of 404 genes was upregulated, and that of 271 genes was downregulated after sublethal CHX treatment. Analysis of differentially expressed genes and significantly regulated pathways showed regulation of genes involved in purine nucleotide synthesis, biofilm formation, transport systems and stress responses. In conclusion, the results show a transcriptomic stress response in S. mutans upon exposure to CHX and offer insight into potential mechanisms that may result in development of resistances.

Highlights

  • This article is an open access articleDespite the current COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains one of the greatest challenges for public health in the 21st century [1,2]

  • The bacterial ability to replicate was investigated for planktonic cultures of S. mutans after treatment with 125 μg/mL chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) by a colony forming units (CFUs) assay

  • Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that all biological replicates grouped together, suggesting that gene expression was significantly influenced by the treatment with CHX compared to untreated samples, explaining 89% of the variance observed in the complete dataset (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article is an open access articleDespite the current COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains one of the greatest challenges for public health in the 21st century [1,2]. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 561 per year for the healthcare services of the 33 countries included in the analysis [3]. Despite many reports about antibiotic resistance, antiseptics or biocides have only recently come into spotlight in the context of AMR [4–7]. Since its introduction into dentistry in the late 1960s [9], CHX has come to be considered the goldstandard antiseptic in oral care [4,10]. It is used for plaque control and management of gingivitis [11]; in patients with high caries risk, such as those with fixed orthodontic appliances [12]; or in patients after periodontal or implant surgery [13]. CHX is included in a wide range of over-the-counter oral care products, such as toothpastes or mouthwashes [11,14,15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.