Abstract

Non-target-site resistance (NTSR) to herbicides is a worldwide concern for weed control. However, as the dominant NTSR mechanism in weeds, metabolic resistance is not yet well-characterized at the genetic level. For this study, we have identified a shortawn foxtail (Alopecurus aequalis Sobol.) population displaying both TSR and NTSR to mesosulfuron-methyl and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, yet the molecular basis for this NTSR remains unclear. To investigate the mechanisms of metabolic resistance, an RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis was used to find candidate genes that may confer metabolic resistance to the herbicide mesosulfuron-methyl in this plant population. The RNA-Seq libraries generated 831,846,736 clean reads. The de novo transcriptome assembly yielded 95,479 unigenes (averaging 944 bp in length) that were assigned putative annotations. Among these, a total of 29,889 unigenes were assigned to 67 GO terms that contained three main categories, and 14,246 unigenes assigned to 32 predicted KEGG metabolic pathways. Global gene expression was measured using the reads generated from the untreated control (CK), water-only control (WCK), and mesosulfuron-methyl treatment (T) of R and susceptible (S). Contigs that showed expression differences between mesosulfuron-methyl-treated R and S biotypes, and between mesosulfuron-methyl-treated, water-treated and untreated R plants were selected for further quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation analyses. Seventeen contigs were consistently highly expressed in the resistant A. aequalis plants, including four cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CytP450) genes, two glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes, two glucosyltransferase (GT) genes, two ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes, and seven additional contigs with functional annotations related to oxidation, hydrolysis, and plant stress physiology. These 17 contigs could serve as major candidate genes for contributing to metabolic mesosulfuron-methyl resistance; hence they deserve further functional study. This is the first large-scale transcriptome-sequencing study to identify NTSR genes in A. aequalis that uses the Illumina platform. This work demonstrates that NTSR is likely driven by the differences in the expression patterns of a set of genes. The assembled transcriptome data presented here provide a valuable resource for A. aequalis biology, and should facilitate the study of herbicide resistance at the molecular level in this and other weed species.

Highlights

  • Agrestal weeds reduce crop yields worldwide by 34%, on average, and are a considerable threat to food security (Oerke, 2005)

  • The whole-plant dose-response experiments demonstrated that the purified R population (AH18) had evolved a high level resistance (RI = 31.15-fold) to mesosulfuron-methyl (Table 1); this was consistent with our previous report (Guo et al, 2016)

  • The observation that, in our present study, malathion caused a significant reduction in the resistance level when it was applied with the herbicide indicated the involvement of at least one CytP450 gene in the resistance mechanisms operating in the R biotype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agrestal weeds reduce crop yields worldwide by 34%, on average, and are a considerable threat to food security (Oerke, 2005). TSR, which arises from the overproduction of the target enzyme or from structural changes in the herbicide binding site, is wellcharacterized in weeds (Délye et al, 2013). An enhanced rate of herbicide metabolism (hereafter, “metabolic resistance”) is by far the dominant NTSR mechanism (Yu and Powles, 2014b). It often involves cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CytP450s), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), glucosyltransferases (GTs), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, as well as other enzyme systems, such as oxidases and hydrolases, which can metabolize herbicides (Preston, 2004; Délye, 2013). NTSR may confer to weeds an unpredictable resistance to herbicides irrespective of their mode of action (Petit et al, 2010b), and this clearly poses a very serious threat to sustainable chemical weed management

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call