Abstract

Breast milk is widely acknowledged as the ideal nutritional resource for infants and can well meet the nutritional requirements for baby’s growth and development. Infant formula is a substitute for breast milk, designed to closely mimic its composition and function for breast milk. Most of the previous studies used tumor colorectal cancer cell lines to study the nutritional potency of formula and its components, so realistic data closer to the baby could not be obtained. Small intestinal organoids, derived from differentiated human embryonic stem cells, can be used to simulate nutrient absorption and metabolism in vitro. In this experiment, we used small intestinal organoids to compare the nutrient absorption and metabolism of three infant formulae for 0–6 months with breast milk samples. Transcriptome and metabolome sequencing methods were used to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs). The pathways related to DEGs, DEMs were enriched using GO, KEGG, GSEA and other methods to investigate their biological characteristics. We have found that both formula and breast milk promote the development of the infant’s immune system, nutrient absorption and intestinal development. In PMH1 we found that the addition of oligofructose to milk powder promoted lipid metabolism and absorption. In PMH2 we found that whey protein powder favours the development of the immune system in infants. In PMH3 we found that oligogalactans may act on the brain-gut axis by regulating the intestinal flora, thereby promoting axon formation and neural development. By linking these biological properties of the milk powder with its composition, we confirmed the effects of added ingredients on the growth and development of infants. Also, we demonstrated the validity of small intestine organoids as a model for absorption and digestion in vitro. Through the above analyses, the advantages and disadvantages of the roles of formula and breast milk in the growth and metabolism of infants were also compared.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.