Abstract

BackgroundPredator-induced defences are a prominent example of phenotypic plasticity found from single-celled organisms to vertebrates. The water flea Daphnia pulex is a very convenient ecological genomic model for studying predator-induced defences as it exhibits substantial morphological changes under predation risk. Most importantly, however, genetically identical clones can be transcriptionally profiled under both control and predation risk conditions and be compared due to the availability of the sequenced reference genome. Earlier gene expression analyses of candidate genes as well as a tiled genomic microarray expression experiment have provided insights into some genes involved in predator-induced phenotypic plasticity. Here we performed the first RNA-Seq analysis to identify genes that were differentially expressed in defended vs. undefended D. pulex specimens in order to explore the genetic mechanisms underlying predator-induced defences at a qualitatively novel level.ResultsWe report 230 differentially expressed genes (158 up- and 72 down-regulated) identified in at least two of three different assembly approaches. Several of the differentially regulated genes belong to families of paralogous genes. The most prominent classes amongst the up-regulated genes include cuticle genes, zinc-metalloproteinases and vitellogenin genes. Furthermore, several genes from this group code for proteins recruited in chromatin-reorganization or regulation of the cell cycle (cyclins). Down-regulated gene classes include C-type lectins, proteins involved in lipogenesis, and other families, some of which encode proteins with no known molecular function.ConclusionsThe RNA-Seq transcriptome data presented in this study provide important insights into gene regulatory patterns underlying predator-induced defences. In particular, we characterized different effector genes and gene families found to be regulated in Daphnia in response to the presence of an invertebrate predator. These effector genes are mostly in agreement with expectations based on observed phenotypic changes including morphological alterations, i.e., expression of proteins involved in formation of protective structures and in cuticle strengthening, as well as proteins required for resource re-allocation. Our findings identify key genetic pathways associated with anti-predator defences.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12983-015-0109-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Predator-induced defences are a prominent example of phenotypic plasticity found from single-celled organisms to vertebrates

  • Daphnia clone used in the experiment In contrast to the clone chosen for genome sequencing by the Daphnia Genomics Consortium (“TCO”), the clone we utilized for the experiment is known to show pronounced production of defensive morphs in the presence of the phantom midge larvae Chaoborus [4]

  • The TCO clone in turn belongs to a group of populations united under the name “Daphnia arenaria” which is likely of hybrid origin with its mitochondrial genome coming from the same clade as R9, while nuclear markers point to closer relationships with North American Daphnia pulicaria [4, 50, 51]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predator-induced defences are a prominent example of phenotypic plasticity found from single-celled organisms to vertebrates. Previous work has shown that different predators, e.g. fish and the phantom midge Chaoborus spp., can induce different, sometimes opposite phenotypic reactions in the same species or clone [10, 14,15,16,17]. This means that the genome must encode multiple developmental programs triggered by environmental conditions. Induced defences in Daphnia include prominent morphological modifications: from tiny cuticular teeth to very elongated tail and head spines, helmets or even giant crests [18,19,20,21], and changes in life history and different behaviours, which all act as deterrents to encounter, capture and ingestion by the predator [9, 22,23,24,25]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call