Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Motor Cortex Activity Influences Visual Awareness Judgments.

Justyna Hobot,Michał Wierzchoń,Marcin Koculak,Kristian Sandberg,Borysław Paulewicz

doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.580712

Abstract

The influence of non-visual information on visual awareness judgments has recently gained substantial interest. Using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we investigate the potential contribution of evidence from the motor system to judgment of visual awareness. We hypothesized that TMS-induced activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) would increase reported visual awareness as compared to the control condition. Additionally, we investigated whether TMS-induced motor-evoked potential (MEP) could measure accumulated evidence for stimulus perception. Following stimulus presentation and TMS, participants first rated their visual awareness verbally using the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS), after which they responded manually to a Gabor orientation identification task. Delivering TMS to M1 resulted in higher average awareness ratings as compared to the control condition, in both correct and incorrect identification task response trials, when the hand with which participants responded was contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere (TMS-response-congruent trials). This effect was accompanied by longer PAS response times (RTs), irrespective of the congruence between TMS and identification response. Moreover, longer identification RTs were observed in TMS-response-congruent trials in the M1 condition as compared to the control condition. Additionally, the amplitudes of MEPs were related to the awareness ratings when response congruence was taken into account. We argue that MEP can serve as an indirect measure of evidence accumulated for stimulus perception and that longer PAS RTs and higher amplitudes of MEPs in the M1 condition reflect integration of additional evidence with visual awareness judgment. In conclusion, we advocate that motor activity influences perceptual awareness judgments.

Highlights

Uncovering the neural processes that shape conscious content is considered a central problem in consciousness science (Faivre et al, 2017)
All effects were taken as random at the participant level
No evidence was found for a general effect of the primary motor cortex (M1) condition on the accuracy, despite the high number of trials and participants

Summary

Introduction

Uncovering the neural processes that shape conscious content is considered a central problem in consciousness science (Faivre et al, 2017). Perceptual awareness judgments—like decision confidence judgments—are a type of metacognitive judgment (Lau and Rosenthal, 2011; Fleming, 2020) and can be measured on multiple scales, such as continuous visual analog scales (Hayes and Patterson, 1921; Sergent and Dehaene, 2004) and the PAS (Ramsøy and Overgaard, 2004). The latter requires participants to rate stimulus awareness with ratings ranging between “no experience” and “a clear experience.”. The latter requires participants to rate stimulus awareness with ratings ranging between “no experience” and “a clear experience.” PAS is considered a sensitive and exhaustive measure of stimulus awareness (Sandberg et al, 2010) and is widely used in consciousness research (Sandberg and Overgaard, 2015)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion