Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve aspects of language production in persons with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to left hemisphere stroke. However, to date, studies exploring factors that predict response to tDCS in this or any patient population remain sparse, as are studies that investigate the specific aspects of language performance that are most responsive to stimulation. The current study explored factors that could predict recovery of language fluency and which aspects of language fluency could be expected to improve with the identified factor(s). We report nine patients who demonstrated deficits in fluency as assessed using the Cookie Theft picture description task of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. In the treatment condition, subjects received a 2.0 mA current through 5 cm × 5 cm electrodes for 20 min at a site previously shown to elicit a patient-dependent optimal response to tDCS. They were then tested 2-weeks and 2-months after treatment. In the sham condition, a subset of these subjects were tested on the same protocol with sham instead of real tDCS. The current study assessed language fluency improvements in measures of production at the word-level and sentence level, grammatical accuracy, and lexical selection as a function of baseline aphasia severity. A more severe baseline language profile was associated with larger improvements in fluency at the word-level after real tDCS but not sham stimulation. These improvements were maintained at the 2-week follow-up. The results suggest that for at least some outcome measures, baseline severity may be an important factor in predicting the response to tDCS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia. Moving forward, the ability to identify patient factors that can predict response could help refine strategies for the administration of therapeutic tDCS, focusing attention on those patients most likely to benefit from stimulation.

Highlights

  • With 80,000 new cases in the US each year and a total of 6.4 million affected individuals, aphasia—acquired loss of language ability—is one of the most common and debilitating poststroke cognitive disorders (Wade et al, 1986; National Stroke Association, 2008; Kyrozis et al, 2009)

  • The current study focused on identifying factors that can predict recovery of language fluency and which aspects of language fluency can be expected to improve with the identified factor(s)

  • Influenced by previous studies in different patient populations that sought to establish factors that influence response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (Turkeltaub et al, 2012; Furuya et al, 2014; Uehara et al, 2015), we predicted that baseline severity would influence the improvement in chronic non-fluent aphasic patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With 80,000 new cases in the US each year and a total of 6.4 million affected individuals, aphasia—acquired loss of language ability—is one of the most common and debilitating poststroke cognitive disorders (Wade et al, 1986; National Stroke Association, 2008; Kyrozis et al, 2009). TDCS modulates brain activity by delivering a weak polarizing electrical current, which is believed to induce incremental shifts in the resting membrane potentials of neurons (Nitsche and Paulus, 2001). These shifts, while insufficient to depolarize neurons acutely, can result in changes in neuronal firing rates, which in turn are associated with measurable changes in cognition and behavior (Schlaug et al, 2009). Repeated sessions of tDCS paired with a behavioral task have been associated with enduring changes in both neural activity and performance (Boggio et al, 2007; Reis et al, 2009; Brunoni et al, 2012) which has given rise to considerable interest in the use of tDCS as an adjunctive treatment in patients with post-stroke deficits, including hemiparesis (Peters et al, 2016), neglect (Yi et al, 2016), and aphasia (Monti et al, 2008; Baker et al, 2010; Fiori et al, 2011; Fridriksson et al, 2011; Medina et al, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call