Transcending Differences Between the Tao and the Logos

Abstract

Contrary to what has been proposed by some former scholars, this paper argues that there is no phonocentrism in the traditional Chinese conception of language in consideration of the differences between Logos and Tao. Different from Logos, which can be objectified and functions as the prerequisite and fixed principle of all meanings, both imposing restrictions and offering possibilities, the characteristic of Tao is that it cannot be fashioned into any shape and cannot be grasped in a definite, concrete way, and it produces all beings without making any regulations for them. Nonetheless, these differences can be transcended by inspecting their similarities in the way to be conveyed and interpreted. Both Zhi() in Chinese philosophy and signify in Western metaphysics can lead to the play of signifiers. And in the process of mutual elucidation, Western metaphysics can find a way out of the restriction of logocentrism, whilst Chinese Tao can obtain a more logical discussion and avoid being distorted by arbitrary interpretation.