Abstract
Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) can be subclassified on the basis of its proportionality relative to left ventricular (LV) volume and function, indicating potential differences in underlying etiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of FMR proportionality with FMR reduction, heart failure hospitalization and mortality after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER). This multicenter registry included 241 patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced LV ejection fraction treated with TEER for moderate to severe or greater FMR. FMR proportionality was graded on preprocedural transthoracic echocardiography using the ratio of the effective regurgitant orifice area to LV end-diastolic volume. Baseline characteristics, follow-up transthoracic echocardiography, and 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Median LV ejection fraction, effective regurgitant orifice area and LV end-diastolic volume index were 30% (interquartile range [IQR], 25%-35%), 27mm2, and 107mL/m2 (IQR, 90-135mL/m2), respectively. Median effective regurgitant orifice area/LV end-diastolic volume ratio was 0.13 (IQR, 0.10-0.18). Proportionate FMR (pFMR) and disproportionate FMR (dFMR) was present in 123 and 118 patients, respectively. Compared with patients with pFMR, those with dFMR had higher baseline LV ejection fractions (median, 32% [IQR, 27%-39%] vs 26% [IQR, 22%-33%]; P<.01). Early FMR reduction with TEER was more pronounced in patients with dFMR (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P<.01) than those with pFMR, but not at 12months (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.53-1.63; P=.80). Overall, in 35% of patients with initial FMR reduction after TEER, FMR deteriorated again at 1-year follow-up. Rates of 2-year all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 30% (n=66) and 37% (n=76), with no differences between dFMR and pFMR. TEER resulted in more pronounced early FMR reduction in patients with dFMR compared with those with pFMR. Yet after initial improvement, FMR deteriorated in a substantial number of patients, calling into question durable mitral regurgitation reductions with TEER in selected patients. The proportionality framework may not identify durable TEER responders.
Highlights
Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) can be subclassified on the basis of its proportionality relative to left ventricular (LV) volume and function, indicating potential differences in underlying etiology
Significant differences between disproportionate FMR (dFMR) and proportionate FMR (pFMR) were observed for sex, stroke or transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and presence of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
The main findings of this multicenter study on the relationship between FMR proportionality at baseline and impact of to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) are as follows: (1) the implementation of the proportionality framework was challenging in our clinical context; (2) patients with dFMR experienced more MR reduction early after clipping, but not at 1-year follow-up; (3) 35% of patients with available 12-month transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) experienced FMR worsening despite initial improvement; (4) overall, 16% of patients were nonresponders, with no FMR reduction at 12 months; and (5) there was no difference in mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalization between proportionality groups after 2 years of follow-up
Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of FMR proportionality with FMR reduction, heart failure hospitalization and mortality after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
