Abstract

BackgroundPermanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains an issue open for criticism. Aim of this study is to investigate a strategy to reduce PPMI rate after TAVI in general and more specifically after implantation of the LOTUS® prosthesis.MethodsThrough our learning curve, we have developed a structured protocol to reduce PPMI rate. The protocol includes: shallow implantation depth within the native annulus, strict adherence to the international guidelines for PPMI, PPMI not earlier than 5 days after TAVI, and intravenous chronotropic and steroidal treatment (orciprenaline 0.6–1.7 mg/h i.v. and dexamethasone 25 mg/day i.v. for a maximum of 5 days) in case of acute onset of intraventricular and/or atrio-ventricular conduction disturbances after TAVI.ResultsThe first 35 patients (group A) were managed as per routine in our early stage experience with the LOTUS valve. The PPMI reduction protocol was applied in the second phase on the last 31 patients (group B). The PPMI rate was reduced from 34.3% (12/35) to 9.7% (3/31) (p = 0.02). At logistic regression analysis being treated in the second phase of our experience (group B) had a protective effect against PPMI (p = 0.05; OR = 0.1; CI = 0.01–1.0). Prosthesis implantation depth was directly related to PPMI (p = 0.005; OR = 2.0; CI = 1.2–3.2). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed that a LOTUS implantation depth > 4.8 mm was the cut-off to predict PPMI (AUC = 0.8; p = 0.003; CI = 0.6–0.9) with maximal sensitivity (78.6%) and specificity (73.2%).ConclusionsPPMI rate after LOTUS can be reduced with experience by applying specific clinical and operative strategies.

Highlights

  • Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains an issue open for criticism

  • We have excluded from this series two patients where TAVI with the LOTUS was abandoned in favor of TAVI with a prosthesis of different model and larger size or to convert to conventional aortic valve replacement

  • We anticipated a possible decrease of the observed PPMI rate by at least two-thirds when applying our PPMI rate reduction protocol

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains an issue open for criticism. Requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains an active unresolved issue. Its rate has been reported from 2 to 51% [1] with variations across studies and valve type In this context, in spite of its added feature of complete repositionability, which guarantees for optimization of final prosthesis position, the ­LOTUS® valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) has been exposed to criticism and restrictions in its application, in light of its increased requirement for post-procedural PPMI. In the REPRISE II multicentre prospective trial, almost a third of the patients treated with the LOTUS prosthesis required post-procedural PPMI [2].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call