Abstract

We seek to explain the emergence of spatial heterogeneity regarding development and pollution on the basis of interactions associated with the movement of capital and polluting activities from one economy to another. We use a simple dynamical model describing capital accumulation along the lines of a fixed-savings-ratio Solow-type model capable of producing endogenous growth and convergence behavior, and pollution accumulation in each country with pollution diffusion between countries or regions. The basic mechanism underlying the movements of capital across space is the quest for locations where the marginal productivity of capital is relatively higher than the productivity at the location of origin. The notion that capital moves to locations of relatively higher productivity but not necessarily from locations of high concentration to locations of low concentration, does not face difficulties associated with the Lucas paradox. We show that, for a wide range of capital and pollution rates of flow, spatial heterogeneity emerges even between two economies with identical fundamental structures. These results can be interpreted as suggesting that the neoclassical convergence hypothesis might not hold under differential rates of flow of capital and polluting activities among countries of the same fundamental structure.

Highlights

  • The study of economic growth, when the detrimental e¤ects of environmental pollution that emerge from the joint production of pollutants are fully accounted for, dates from the early 1970s.1 During this period, various models coupling growth with environmental e¤ects were developed

  • Inequality in the distribution of capital across nations has many contributing factors, some tied to environmental resources, and some historical

  • We illustrate that in this paper by considering two nations (North and South), which are initially identical in their resources, and in their stocks of capital

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of economic growth, when the detrimental e¤ects of environmental pollution that emerge from the joint production of pollutants are fully accounted for, dates from the early 1970s.1 During this period, various models coupling growth with environmental e¤ects were developed. To analyze the e¤ects of capital ‡ows and pollution ‡ows between the two economies, we consider whether small perturbations enhanced by di¤usion, that is transport of polluting activities and capital mobility between the two regions, can destabilize the spatially homogeneous steady state. In this we extend the classical arguments of Turing (1952), and standard methods (Murray 1993). The emergence of spatial instability can be made more clear with the help of a numerical example

A numerical example
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call