Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC.