Abstract

ObjectivesThe popularity of trans-radial access (TRA) for cerebral angiography is growing. Potential benefits of TRA over traditional trans-femoral access (TFA) are multitude. This study aimed to evaluate discharge outcomes and patient opinion of TRA compared to TFA in patients undergoing cerebral angiography prior to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. MethodsConsecutive patients treated at the ONLY < BLINDED FOR REVIEW>) over a 22-month period were included. All patients underwent cerebral angiography with either TRA or TFA as part of treatment planning prior to SRS. TRA patients who had previously undergone TFA in other centres were surveyed for their experience of cerebral angiography using a questionnaire. SRS staff at our centre were approached for their opinion. Results492 patients were included (median age = 43 years, 57.5% male, median lesions treated = 1). More patients underwent angiography with TFA (75.2%) than TRA (24.8%). No difference was found in accumulated dose for angiography between the groups (p>0.05). There was 17.6% reduction in overnight stay between TRA and TRF, the proportion of patients requiring overnight admission was higher for the TFA (35.2%) than TRA (17.6%, p<0.05). 101 patients were surveyed, with a response rate of 47%. Most respondents (79%) indicated preference for TRA over TFA. ConclusionsUse of TRA in pre-SRS cerebral angiography is feasible and improves both patient and staff experience. The adoption of TRA could have important implications for department resources and costs by reducing the proportion of overnight admissions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call