Trajectory modeling and response prediction in transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy could be improved by more accurate and earlier prediction of response. Latent class mixture (LCMM) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modeling have been applied to model the trajectories of antidepressant response (or non-response) to TMS, but it is not known whether such models are useful in predicting clinically meaningful change in symptom severity, i.e. categorical (non)response as opposed to continuous scores. MethodsWe compared LCMM and NLME approaches to model the antidepressant response to TMS in a naturalistic sample of 238 patients receiving rTMS for treatment resistant depression, across multiple coils and protocols. We then compared the predictive power of those models. ResultsLCMM trajectories were influenced largely by baseline symptom severity, but baseline symptoms provided little predictive power for later antidepressant response. Rather, the optimal LCMM model was a nonlinear two-class model that accounted for baseline symptoms. This model accurately predicted patient response at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC=0.70, 95 % CI=[0.52–0.87]), but not before. NLME offered slightly improved predictive performance at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC=0.76, 95 % CI=[0.58–0.94], but likewise, not before. ConclusionsIn showing the predictive validity of these approaches to model response trajectories to rTMS, we provided preliminary evidence that trajectory modeling could be used to guide future treatment decisions.