Abstract

Trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers to Sun–Earth/Moon libration point orbits (LPOs) with continuous thrusts are investigated using an ephemeris model. The lunar flyby transfer has special geometrical and dynamical structures; therefore, its trajectory correction strategy is considerably different from that of previous studies and should be specifically designed. In this paper, we first propose a control strategy based on the backstepping technique with a dead-band scheme using an ephemeris model. The initial error caused by the launch time error is considered. Since the perturbed transfers significantly diverge from the reference transfers after the spacecraft passes by the Moon, we adopt two sets of control parameters in two portions before and after the lunar flyby, respectively. Subsequently, practical constraints owing to the navigation and propellant systems are introduced in the dynamical model of the trajectory correction. Using a prograde type 2 orbit as an example, numerical simulations show that our control strategy can efficiently address trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers with different practical constraints. In addition, we analyze the effects of the navigation intervals and dead-band scheme on trajectory corrections. Finally, trajectory corrections for different lunar flyby transfers are depicted and compared.

Highlights

  • Because of the special dynamical properties of Sun– Earth/Moon libration point orbits (LPOs), many scientific and exploration missions to Sun–Earth/Moon LPOs have been implemented, such as ISEE-3 [1], WIND [2], and SOHO [3] for Sun–Earth/Moon L1 LPOs, MAP [4], GAIA [5], and CHANG’E-2 [6] for Sun–Earth/Moon L2 LPOs.Many researchers focused on transfer problems to Sun– Earth/Moon LPOs

  • The trajectory correction maneuver (TCM) problem is a significant problem associated with transfers to LPOs since perturbations and errors are inevitable during practical transfer missions

  • Serban et al investigated the TCM problem of the Genesis Discovery Mission using optimal control to compensate for launch vehicle errors, and they proposed two strategies to solve the TCM problem: the halo orbit insertion (HOI) and the manifold orbit insertion (MOI) techniques [13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because of the special dynamical properties of Sun– Earth/Moon libration point orbits (LPOs), many scientific and exploration missions to Sun–Earth/Moon LPOs have been implemented, such as ISEE-3 [1], WIND [2], and SOHO [3] for Sun–Earth/Moon L1 LPOs, MAP [4], GAIA [5], and CHANG’E-2 [6] for Sun–Earth/Moon L2 LPOs. Salmani and Buskens proposed a real-time control method for the TCM of transfers to Sun–Earth L1 halo orbits in the Sun–Earth–Moon bicircular model [16]. Qi and de Ruiter investigated the TCM problem of lunar flyby transfers to Sun–Earth/Moon LPOs in the ephemeris model, and proposed several TCM strategies for lunar flyby transfers under practical constraints [18]. Trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers to Sun–Earth/Moon LPOs are investigated using the ephemeris model. In contrast to the traditional applications of the backstepping technique, such as station-keeping and attitude tracking, since the perturbed transfers significantly diverge from the reference transfers after the spacecraft passes by the Moon, we should use two sets of control parameters in two portions before and after the lunar flyby.

Ephemeris model
Lunar flyby transfers to libration point orbits
Control strategy
Practical constraints
Effects of navigation intervals
Effects of the dead-band scheme
Examples of different lunar flyby transfers
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call