Abstract

Color polymorphism defies evolutionary expectations as striking phenotypic variation is maintained within a single species. Color and other traits mediate social interactions, and stable polymorphism within a population is hypothesized to be related to correlational selection of other phenotypic traits among color morphs. Here, we report on a previously unknown throat color polymorphism in the Aegean Wall Lizard (Podarcis erhardii) and examine morph-correlated differences in traits important to social behavior and communication: maximum bite force capacity and chemical signal profile. We find that both sexes of P. erhardii have three color morphs: orange, yellow, and white. Moreover, orange males are significantly larger and tend to bite harder than yellow and white males. Although the established color polymorphism only partially matches the observed intraspecific variation in chemical signal signatures, the chemical profile of the secretions of orange males is significantly divergent from that of white males. Our findings suggest that morph colors are related to differences in traits that are crucial for social interactions and competitive ability, illustrating the need to look beyond color when studying polymorphism evolution.

Highlights

  • Understanding processes that generate and maintain phenotypic variation is a fundamental goal in evolutionary biology

  • Results from Linear Discriminant Function Analysis (LDFA) of females and males show that the three color morphs are discernable (Figs. 2C & 2D), and color morphs significantly differ based on the 10 colorimetric variables (Wilks’ Lambda p < 0.001)

  • We found that P. erhardii male color morphs tend to differ in two important lizard social traits: their maximum bite force capacities and chemical signal signatures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding processes that generate and maintain phenotypic variation is a fundamental goal in evolutionary biology. Color polymorphic species offer a unique opportunity to study evolutionary processes underlying phenotypic variation (Ford, 1945; Huxley, 1955) such as natural and sexual selection (Kapan, 2001; Corl et al, 2010a; Seehausen, Van Alphen & Lande, 1999), gene flow (Harley et al, 2006), and genetic drift (Runemark et al, 2010), because color morphs can be used as phenotypic proxies for genetic markers (reviewed in Roulin, 2004; Svensson, 2017). We still have an incomplete understanding of how color polymorphism evolves, and of the evolutionary processes underlying its maintenance (reviewed in Gray & McKinnon, 2007; McLean, Stuart-Fox & Moussalli, 2014)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call