Abstract

Background To achieve greater coverage of elderly smokers and to shift entire populations toward cessation, the provider–client interface could be broadened beyond physicians to include nurses and social workers, who can be formally trained to provide such services. We carried out a population-based training needs assessment of the latter two groups in Hong Kong. Methods Three thousand seven hundred eligible hospital-based nurses and 2,258 social workers who had elderly clients in Hong Kong were recruited in a knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) cross-sectional survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for two key outcomes—“initiation and advice” (ask and advise) and “follow-through” (assess, assist and arrange), based on the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy Research framework. Results One thousand eight hundred forty-three (49.8%) nurses and 1,499 (66.4%) social workers responded. Nurses reported a much higher level of engagement in smoking cessation activities than social workers in all five steps of the AHCPR framework ( P < 0.001). Nurses (mean score = 2.99 ± 0.40 on a 4-point Likert scale) had more positive attitudes to tobacco control and smoking cessation counseling compared to social workers (mean score = 2.79 ± 0.41; P < 0.001), whereas the latter group perceived themselves as more competent in handling such practice (mean score nurses = 2.36 ± 0.52, mean score social workers = 2.51 ± 0.39; P < 0.001). Both attitudinal and self-perceived competence scores predicted incremental gains in the likelihood of offering “follow-through” interventions in addition to those observed for “initiation and advice” actions. Conclusion Our findings highlight a large degree of unmet need in Hong Kong's hospital-based nurses and social workers who work with the elderly regarding smoking cessation service provision and training. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating programs that encourage nurses and social workers to provide cessation interventions to exert a much greater collective impact than doctors can alone.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.