Abstract

The aim of training executive functions is usually to improve the ability to attain real-life goals such as academic achievement, that is, far transfer. Although many executive function trainings are successful in improving executive functions, far transfer is more difficult to achieve (cf. Diamond and Lee, 2011; Sala and Gobet, 2020). In this perspective article, we focus on the transfer of executive function training to academic performance. First, we disentangle possible sources of transfer problems. We argue that executive functions can facilitate academic performance via two specific pathways, namely learning-related behaviors and learning-related cognitions. Further, we discuss how domain-specific factors (e.g., task-specific demands and prior knowledge) may influence the successful application of executive functions to learning in this domain. Second, we discuss how the school setting can be used to enhance executive function training with approaches to facilitating far transfer to academic achievement. Specifically, we suggest that training executive functions as a means to improve academic performance is most promising in young students, for whom both behavioral and domain-specific cognitive demands of formal schooling are quite novel challenges. Furthermore, we outline that students could be supported in far transfer of trained executive functions by being informed of the specific relevance of these skills for learning-related behaviors and by having them practice executive functions under such authentic conditions. Moreover, we suggest that in order to promote ongoing effects of executive function training beyond short-term interventions, teachers should be equipped to consider the specific executive function components that might facilitate and support students’ acquisition of a particular subject matter.

Highlights

  • Training of executive functions usually aims at improving real-life goal attainment via executive function gains, for instance, in the area of academic achievement

  • A major challenge in executive function training is achieving a successful transfer to goalattainment in real-life contexts (e.g., Sala and Gobet, 2020; Nesbitt and Farran, 2021)

  • We summarize our perspective of how transfer of executive function trainings to academic goals might be achieved

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Training of executive functions usually aims at improving real-life goal attainment via executive function gains, for instance, in the area of academic achievement (cf. Jacob and Parkinson, 2015; Diamond and Ling, 2020; Smid et al, 2020). An influential model by Miyake et al (2000) has distinguished three executive function components in adults, namely, working memory/updating, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility/attention shifting. There is evicence that distinct executive function components can be distinguished even in this age group In their meta-analysis on executive function trainings for children aged 2 to 12 years, Kassai et al (2019) found that children who received training in working memory, inhibitory control, or cognitive flexibility tended to improve in the trained components but not in the others. With regard to cognitive training, studies with both children and adults have found substantial evidence for near transfer of executive function training to performance on untrained structurally identical tasks (e.g., Jaeggi et al, 2010; Sala and Gobet, 2017, 2019, 2020; Kassai et al, 2019; Johann and Karbach, 2020). Even considering a possible publication bias favoring studies with significant effects, this is evidence for the trainability of executive functions (cf. Karbach and Kray, 2016; Diamond and Ling, 2020)

HOW ARE EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IMPORTANT FOR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT?
Focus on Young Children
Include Teachers
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call