Training Disparities of Our Future Workforce: A Survey of Trauma Fellowship Candidates

Abstract

BackgroundTraining in Acute Care Surgery (ACS) is an integral component of general surgery residency and serves as a critical base experience for the added educational qualifications of fellowship. How this training varies between programs is not well characterized. We sought to describe the variation in clinical exposure between residencies in a sample of residents applying to an ACS fellowship. We hypothesized that applicants have significant variations in clinical exposure as well as unique and specific expectations for educational experiences. Materials and methodsWe offered an anonymous 82-question survey focused on residency clinical exposure and self-perceived confidence in key areas of ACS training, as well as fellowship training and career expectations to all applicants interviewed at a single trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery fellowship program. Responses were assessed via absolute numbers and confidence via a 5-point Likert scale; data are reported using descriptive statistics and linear regression models. ResultsForty-two interviewing applicants completed the survey, for a 96% response rate. Applicants reported heterogeneous levels of comfort across most ACS domains. There was good correlation between experience and comfort in most procedural areas. During fellowship training, respondents placed highest priority on operative experience, with 43% rating this as their highest priority, followed by penetrating trauma experience (33%). ConclusionsWe found significant variations in both experience and comfort within key ACS domains among fellowship applicants. Despite training variability, there was good correlation between experience and self-reported comfort. Collaboration between residency and fellowship governing bodies may help address areas of limited exposure before entry into clinical practice.