Abstract

Objectives:This paper aims to depict unique perspectives and to compare and contrast three leadership programs for global health in order to enable other training institutions to design impactful curricula.Methods:We purposively selected three global health training programs. We used a six-step curriculum development framework to systematically compare the curriculum process across programs and to identify best practices and factors contributing to the impact of each of these programs.Findings:All three fellowship programs undertook an intentional and in-depth approach to curriculum development. Each identified competencies related to leadership and technical skills. Each defined goals, though the goals differed to align with the desired impact of the program, ranging from improving the impact of HIV programming, supporting stronger global health program implementation, and supporting the next generation of global health leaders. All programs implemented the curriculum through an onboarding phase, a delivery of core content in different formats, and a wrap-up or endline phase. During implementation, each program also utilized networking and mentoring to enhance connections and to support application of learning in work roles. Programs faced overlapping challenges and opportunities including funding, strengthening partnerships, and finding ways to engage and support alumni.Conclusions:Local ownership of programs is critical, including tailoring curricula to the needs of specific contexts. Strong partnerships and resources are needed to ensure program sustainability and impact.Key TakeawaysGlobal health competencies and curricula should be linked to local health system needs and contexts where learners are working.Emphasizing both individualistic and collectivist approaches to learning is important in engaging and supporting diverse global health learners.Emphasizing mentorship and opportunities to apply learning in contexts where learners are working is important in order to provide support to learners as they work to integrate what they are learning into their professional roles and activities.Partnerships and resources—including donor support—are essential to implement and sustain robust leadership curricula and to provide opportunities for experiential and didactic learning.

Highlights

  • Global health has been defined as “the area of study, research and practice that places a priority on improving health and achieving equity in health for all people worldwide” [1, 2]

  • We purposively selected a set of three global health leadership training programs (The Afya Bora Consortium Fellowship in Global Health Leadership, The Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) Project, and Global Health Corps (GHC))

  • The strength of the Afya Bora Consortium fellowship lies in the diversity of its curricula and the fact that it is aligned with leadership gaps in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in Africa, the interprofessional nature of recruited fellows, the north-south and south-south collaboration, module delivery, mentorship, and networking

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global health has been defined as “the area of study, research and practice that places a priority on improving health and achieving equity in health for all people worldwide” [1, 2]. The changing landscape of global health has spurred the need to champion an increased emphasis on interprofessional approaches to health service delivery and the cultivation of leadership skills to build local leadership capacity [5]. The Consortium for Global Health (CUGH) developed interprofessional competencies for global health that can be adopted as guidelines when developing training curricula with different scopes and available resources [8]. The process of developing global health competencies and curricula is often insufficiently inclusive of input from host country health professionals and fails to take adequate account of local health contexts. The methods applied and resources available for meaningfully assessing global health curricula are frequently inadequate [10, 11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call