Abstract

Purpose:  Adopting a specific strategy is sometimes the key to the survival of companies. Given the increasing interest on the part of the companies to have the best strategy that allows them to differentiate themselves from their competitors, the aim of this empirical work is to study the relationship that exists between training and business results. Design/methodology/approach:  The empirical set of this paper is comprised by a survey applied to 381 large organizations in Catalonia region during the time frame of 2066-2007. At one hand, the survey allowed identifying the independent (training) variables, and at other, the dependent variables (economical) were obtained from Sabi Data Base and from the “Fomento de la Producción” Magazine. Findings:  According to data obtained, it is possible to consider training as an additional strategic tool that should be used by companies to improve their performance outcomes. Originality/value:  Taking into account that the literature review only demonstrates studies linking training and results such as total shareholder return, productivity, higher quality of customer services, reduced staff turnover, organizational performance, growth on the staff wages, etc., therefore, the key value of the paper rely at one hand on providing an analysis of the impact of training on billing and at other, on the use of the Model of Industrial Economy as part of the theoretical framework for the causal model development.

Highlights

  • In the current business context, one of the most pressing concerns is the pursuit of competitive advantage

  • That organisation was carried out taking into account the underlying theory which had supported the model, which enabled the maintenance of the necessary conditions for modelling with the structural equation system

  • In the actual business environment one of the most important concern focuses on building competitive advantages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the current business context, one of the most pressing concerns is the pursuit of competitive advantage. The second group of authors includes Black & Lynch (1996), Bartel (2000) who cited Bishop (1988), Holzer (1993), Tan and Batra (1995), Huselid (1995), Ichniowski (1997), Krueger and Rouse (1998), Barron et al (1997), Tennant et al (2002) and Chu (2005) In their studies, these authors analysed the impact of training on business productivity concluding firstly that the workers who receive additional training go on to increase their salaries, and secondly, that the companies which give their workers more training benefit from a higher return on capital. It seems clear that knowledge has become an essential economic resource and perhaps the ability to learn more quickly than the competitors can become one of the truly differentiating sources of competitive advantage (Reyes, 2005)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.