Abstract
In Experiment 1, a response-sensitive instructional strategy was compared to more traditional instructional strategies in an embedded training program designed for manual data entry operators in the Army TOS command and control system. Results showed that using the response-sensitive strategy reduced training time without reducing inputting accuracy. Experiment 2 examined the relative efficiency of four different manual data entry methods: Typing, Typing with an error corrector, Menus, and Auto-completion with an English option. Results show that Menus are the most accurate inputting method. No differences were found in entry time among the methods. Results also showed little agreement between preference and performance for the methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
