Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that interpretations can be trained using Cognitive Bias Modification procedures (CBM). The effects are replicable, stable over time and there is some evidence of generalizability. As a next step in determining the boundaries of the CBM model, the present experiment was designed to test whether modified interpretive style endures fluctuations in mood. Participants were trained to interpret ambiguous scenarios in either a positive ( n = 42) or negative ( n = 40) way. Then, participants were exposed to either a positive ( n = 41) or negative ( n = 41) mood induction procedure to change their current mood state. Results showed that the modified interpretive bias did not change in reaction to a mood change. That is, differences in interpretation of new ambiguous information were related to the interpretive bias modification procedure and not to the current mood state.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.