Traffic safety education: panacea, prophylactic or placebo?

Abstract

Education is one of the strategies available to reduce traffic crashes and the resultant personal injury. It is seen by many as the major strategy for achieving lasting change. However, there is considerable debate as to the effectiveness of traffic safety education programs to date and, in an era when public expenditure is strongly influenced by the results of cost-benefit analyses, the more fundamental traffic safety education programs are under increasing challenge. The literature on effectiveness is indeed confusing. All too often, programs have commenced from a position of blind faith and have been implemented unsystematically, without specific objectives, targets, or evaluative milestones. The problem is compounded by the considerable methodological difficulties which confront the evaluators of long-term programs of behavior change. If traffic safety education is to survive as a viable countermeasure, program planning and execution must become far more scientific and evaluation must become an integral component. There is also an arguable case for the funds for the longer-term behavior change programs to come from the more general public health arena than from the narrower traffic safety field, while the short-term, specific educational programs should compete directly for funds with alternative traffic safety measures available for the given problem.