Abstract

This paper examines the validity of the Markovian assumption which is commonly made for modeling of correlated traffic in network analyses. Indeed, real traffic is likely to be nonMarkovian. A fundamental issue in traffic modeling is whether the Markovian assumption has any significance on the queueing solutions. Our study compares the queueing solutions obtained using traffic models with very different underlying structure viz. Markovian vs. nonMarkovian. The Markovian model is represented by a circulant modulated rate process (CMRP). The nonMarkovian model is represented by an ARMA process with or without nonlinear modifications. The two models can be made identical in their second-order and steady-state statistics, but with significantly different higher-order statistics. Comprehensive studies with different rational power spectra and distributions show that the queueing results using these two traffic models match very closely. Our study suggests that higher-order traffic statistics are generally unimportant to queueing solutions. In essence, for a certain class of stationary stochastic processes, the Markovian assumption can be made in traffic modeling to simplify the queueing analysis, as long as the important statistics are captured.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.