Abstract
Deterministic transmission technology is a core key technology that supports deterministic real-time transmission requirements for industrial control in Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN). It requires each network node to have a deterministic forwarding delay to ensure the real-time end-to-end transmission of critical traffic streams. Therefore, when forwarding data frames, the switch nodes must consider the time-limited requirements of the traffic. In the input-queued switch system, an algorithm for clock-synchronized deterministic network traffic classification scheduling (CSDN-TCS) is proposed to address the issue of whether a higher-quality-of-service (QoS) performance can be provided under packet deadline constraints. First, the scheduling problem of the switch is transformed into a decomposition problem of the traffic matrix. Secondly, the maximum weight-matching algorithm in graph theory is used to solve the matching results slot by slot. By fully utilizing the slot resources, as many packets as possible can be scheduled to be completed before the deadline arrives. For two types of packet scheduling problems, this paper uses the maximum flow algorithm with upper- and lower-bound constraints to move packets from a larger deadline set to idle slots in a smaller deadline set, enabling early transmission, reducing the average packet delay, and increasing system throughput. When there are three or more types of deadlines in the scheduling set, this scheduling problem is an NP-hard problem. We solve this problem by polling the two types of scheduling algorithms. In this paper, simulation experiments based on the switching size and line load are designed, and the Earliest Deadline First (EDF) algorithm and the Flow-Based Iterative Packet Scheduling (FIPS) algorithm are compared with the CSDN-TCS algorithm. The simulation results show that under the same conditions, the CSDN-TCS algorithm proposed in this paper outperforms the other two algorithms in terms of success rate, packet loss rate, average delay and throughput rate. Compared with the FIPS algorithm, the CSDN-TCS algorithm has lower time complexity under the same QoS performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.