Abstract

In this contribution, we try to show that traditional Aristotelian logic can be useful (in a non-trivial way) for computational thinking. To achieve this objective, we argue in favor of two statements: (i) that traditional logic is not classical and (ii) that logic programming emanating from traditional logic is not classical logic programming.

Highlights

  • We argue in favor of two claims: (i) that traditional logic is not classical logic, and (ii) that logic programming emerging from traditional logic is not classical logic programming

  • We have recovered some ideas of the traditional, Aristotelian logic in order to observe some of its qualities in the context of computational thinking

  • We have tried to take advantage of an educational gap within the typical computational thinking literature—namely, that traditional logic is missing—in order to suggest that good old logic can be useful for computational thinking

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this contribution, we try to take advantage of this educational gap in order to show that traditional logic can be useful (in a non-trivial way) for computational thinking. Syllogistic is a term logic that deals with inference between categorical statements (vide Appendix A), and from a larger point of view, it is an integral part of what we could call a basic corpus aristotelicum that, in turn, could be defined by the tuple A = h BE , BC , BO , BP , BL i

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.