Abstract

Polar bears are important socio-cultural symbols in the communities of the Eeyou Marine Region (EMR) in northwestern Québec, Canada. Members of the Cree communities in this region are generally not active polar bear hunters, but they encounter polar bears when fishing, trapping, or hunting during the ice-free season. A growing body of scientific evidence suggests that reduced annual sea ice cover in Hudson Bay has led to declines in body condition of polar bears in the local Southern Hudson Bay subpopulation and to a population decline in the neighboring Western Hudson Bay subpopulation. In June 2012, we conducted 15 semi-directed interviews on the subject of polar bear biology and climate change with local elders and hunters in three communities in the northern EMR: Wemindji, Chisasibi, and Whapmagoostui. The interviews held in Whapmagoostui included informants from Kuujjuarapik, the adjacent Inuit community. The interviews addressed knowledge gaps in the Recovery Strategy for Polar Bear in Ontario. Transcripts of the interviews were coded thematically and analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The interviews revealed important insights into polar bear distribution, terrestrial habitat use, denning, and foraging patterns. Participants were unanimous in their recognition of a warming climate and prolonged ice-free season in the area in recent years. However, communities differed in their observations on other issues, with latitudinal trends evident in observations of polar bear distribution, denning activity, and foraging habits. Communities also differed in their perception of the prevalence of problem polar bears and the conservation status of the species, with one-third of participants reporting that polar bears will be unaffected by, or even benefit from, longer ice-free periods. A majority of participants indicated that the local polar bear population was stable or increasing. Interviewees also identified future research priorities pertinent to the communities, and provided comments on the methods employed by polar bear biologists. Our results demonstrate that communities in the EMR have important knowledge about polar bear ecology and illustrate the unique opportunities and challenges of combining traditional ecological knowledge with wildlife science in the context of a rapidly changing subarctic environment.

Highlights

  • Recognizing the knowledge of Northerners when conducting research in the Arctic is gaining momentum in Canada (Riedlinger and Berkes, 2001; Huntington, 2011; Canadian Polar Commission, 2014)

  • We conducted interviews in the communities of Wemindji, Chisasibi, and Whapmagoostui/Kuujjuarapik, Québec, in June 2012 (Fig. 1). We identified these communities in collaboration with the Cree Nation Government (CNG) and the Cree Trappers’ Association (CTA) to participate in a study on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of polar bears because of interest within the communities and because they have a higher encounter rate with polar bears during the ice-free season than the more southerly (Eastmain and Waskaganish) and northerly (Umiujaq) communities in the Eeyou Marine Region (EMR)

  • The findings of our study indicate that one of the main contributors to this difference between scientists and many TEK holders in the EMR is a difference of understanding on some fundamental aspects of polar bear biology, such as feeding ecology and the dependence of polar bears on the sea ice for many facets of their life history

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Recognizing the knowledge of Northerners when conducting research in the Arctic is gaining momentum in Canada (Riedlinger and Berkes, 2001; Huntington, 2011; Canadian Polar Commission, 2014). We conducted interviews in the communities of Wemindji, Chisasibi, and Whapmagoostui/Kuujjuarapik, Québec, in June 2012 (Fig. 1) We identified these communities in collaboration with the Cree Nation Government (CNG) and the Cree Trappers’ Association (CTA) to participate in a study on TEK of polar bears because of interest within the communities and because they have a higher encounter rate with polar bears during the ice-free season than the more southerly (Eastmain and Waskaganish) and northerly (Umiujaq) communities in the EMR. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to document polar bear knowledge in the EMR This interview method has proven appropriate in North American Arctic Indigenous groups (Ferguson and Messier, 1997; Huntington, 1998; Dowsley, 2007; Ferguson et al, 2012), as well as Cree communities in Ontario and Québec (Lemelin et al, 2010; Herrmann et al, 2012; Royer et al, 2013). Given the small sample size in each community, we used the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test of independence to test for differences in observations among communities (Lydersen et al, 2007)

RESULTS
Research Methods and Future Research Priorities
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call