Abstract
The author analyzes the concept of “traditional bookishness” in scientific discourse, noting its unreasonably wide, not terminological, but rather metaphorical use. The reasons for this seem to be: 1) an arbitrary idea of the scope and composition of this concept, which, depending on the field of knowledge, can be identified with folklore works, and sacred texts, and with medieval literature in general, and with the literature of reflective traditionalism, and with “ready word” narratives, etc.; 2) understanding of traditionalism as a single, homogeneous and monolithic creative system, while it appears in at least three of its modifications: traditional-canonical, conservation-etiquette and imitative-rhetorical.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Stephanos Peer reviewed multilanguage scientific journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
