Abstract

There has for many years been legal recognition of Traditional Leaders in South African laws, such as the Black Administration Act 38 of 1927 and regulations and proclamations issued in terms of other legislation. Recently legal recognition was confirmed in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996. 
 Additional recognition of Traditional Leaders and the institution of Traditional Leadership is found in the various provincial legislation providing for Provincial Houses of Traditional Leaders and the establishment and functioning of the National Council of Traditional Leaders. 
 Yet the institution of Traditional Leadership has over the past few years given rise to much controversy. There are those who argue that the institution is outdated and others who regard Traditional Leaders as custodians of customary values and the only leaders who are truly responsible for the well being of communities historically and religiously entrusted to them. 
 Traditional leaders fulfil a variety of functions in rural society, including that of presiding officer in customary courts, mediator of disputes, advisor in agricultural and family matters, guardian of young, old, infirm and abandoned. They perform legislative, executive and judicial functions according to the wish of the majority of the members of the tribe. 
 It became apparent, that de facto Traditional Authorities are the only existing form of local government in rural areas in South Africa. It seems unlikely that, in the foreseeable future, it will be financially, politically or practically possible to replace this form of rural government with a comprehensive and sustainable alternative. 
 The future role of Traditional Leadership in the development process is significant in that in addition to the recognition afforded by the Constitution and other legislation, the development law, unfolding in modern day South Africa under a new
 development paradigm, distinctly provides for Traditional Leaders to play a significant role in rural development and development planning at local government level in rural areas. 
 The role and function of the Traditional Leaders of South Africa in the rural development process unfolds as the Integrated planning process comes into operation as envisaged in section 10 of the Local Government Transition Act 209 of 1993 read with the .principles contained in the Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995. 
 The development principles and the regulations prescribing the process of formulating land development objectives, provides for an inclusive process in which all role players and stakeholders are to be involved. In practice this means that communities, community organizations and institutions, as concerned role players in civil society, are also the concerned and key role players in the development planning and development process at local level. No plan and development strategy will therefore meet the prescribed legal requirements of acceptable development planning standards, if the rural communities and their leaders are not directly and actively involved. 
 Much of the confusion and conflict between Traditional Leadership and Customary Law Councilors on the one hand and elected Local Government Councilors on the other, arose as a result of a misunderstanding of the valuable support role which Traditional Leaders can play in the development process. The difference in the nature and scope of the tasks of elected and traditional community leaders provide a rich multi-facet basis on which a successful local governance system can be developed within the context of the current constitutional-legal framework in South Africa. 
 In many other countries in Africa it was only realized after repeated failures of rural development experiments, that Traditional Leaders and Traditional Authorities constitute a most valuable asset in the rural development process. 

Highlights

  • Amptelike grondwetlike erkenning is vir die eerste keer in die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993 aan tradisionele leiers verleen

  • Moderniste is van mening dat die instelling van tradisionele leiers uitgedien is terwyl dit steeds erken en gerespekteer word deur die verskillende gemeenskappe in Suid-Afrika

  • Die vernaamste van hierdie funksies het te make met hulle rol as regsprekende amptenare in tradisionele howe, beslegters van geskille buite die hof, religieuse leiers van die gemeenskap, politieke leiers van die lede van die stam, draers van die hoogste gesag oor die toekenning en gebruik van grond onder sy jurisdiksie, en as daardie persoon wat in die laaste instansie verantwoordelik is vir die welsyn en ontwikkeling van alle lede van die stam

Read more

Summary

Swart Administrasie Wet 38 van 1927

In KwaZulu-Natal is daar volgens mededeling deur Nkosi Ngubane tydens vraetyd by die internasionale konferensie oor tradisionele leierskap in Suider-Afrika 16 - 18 April te Umtata, tans ses vroulike tradisionele leiers net in daardie provinsie alleen. Die eerste amptelike erkenning van tradisionele leiers is in artikel 2(7) van die Swart Administrasie Wet 38 van 1927 verleen. Die President word gemagtig om tradisionele leiers vir stamme of gemeenskappe aan te wys en kan ook die pligte, bevoegdhede en voorregte uiteensit en voorwaardes vir die uitoefening van die amp daarstel. Die tradisionele leiers en die stamrade, streeks- en gebiedsowerhede het heelwat bevoegdhede verkry. Alhoewel die bevoegdhede sekere ontwikkelings- en plaaslike owerheid funksies ingesluit het, was die stamme as gevolg van 'n gebrek aan finansies en opleiding nie altyd in staat om daarvan gebruik te maak nie. Die Swart Administrasie Wet het verder aan die tradisionele leier strafregtelike en siviele bevoegdhede verleen. Tradisionele owerhede is deur die staat betaal - dit was 'n ander wyse waarop beheer oor tradisionele owerhede vanaf sentrale regeringskant uitgeoefen kon word

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993
Gevolgtrekking
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.