Trading safety for food: evidence from gut contents in roach and bleak captured at different distances offshore from their daytime littoral refuge

Abstract

Summary1. Regular diel habitat shifts in roach were detected by hydro‐acoustics in five moderately eutrophic, stratifying (maximum depth 24–27 m) and approximately circular lakes (of surface area 15, 75, 125, 300 and 900 ha and diameters 250, 600, 1000, 1700 and 2600 m) in north‐eastern Poland in the years 1998–2000, when the lakes were free of smelt and other typical offshore planktivores, and their offshore areas were completely free of fish during the day.2. The diel change in roach distribution was shown to assume a similar pattern in each lake: fish migrated from a daytime littoral refuge towards the centre of the lake at dusk, and returned to the littoral refuge at dawn. After sunset, fish gradually dispersed offshore until they covered the entire lake area in each of the three smaller lakes. In each of the two larger lakes, only small numbers of fish were seen in the central area at night, implying that the centre of the lake retained high food availability throughout the summer.3. Inshore–offshore gradients in zooplankton prey density, body size, and numbers of eggs per clutch were weak or undetectable in the two smallest lakes, but strong and persistent in the three larger lakes, with Daphnia densities 5–30 times as high and body length 1.2–1.5 times as great in the central area as inshore.4. The likely increase in the potential predation risk with distance from the littoral daytime refuge was found to be compensated by increased food gains in those fish which moved offshore at dusk to feed within a short time window, when light intensity was lower to make the risk reduced, but still high enough to see zooplankton prey. The benefit because of increased prey acquisition was greatest in the centre of the largest lake (at 1300 m from the shore), as revealed from gut inspections of roach and bleak trawl‐sampled at different distances from the edge of the reed belt, and seen as a gradual, order‐of‐magnitude increase in the volume of food in the foregut, The food volume against distance‐from‐shore regression was highly significant on each of the four sampling dates in the largest lake, in spite of the wide variability of food volume in individual fish.