Trading off retained daily catch for longer seasons to maximize angler benefits in recreational fisheries management

Abstract

Abstract Recreational fishing benefits associated with angling opportunity, such as fishing season duration and certainty of season duration, may outweigh trip-based benefits, such as retained catch, in measures of angler utility. We developed an age-structured population dynamics model to predict how these three beneficial attributes are affected by four recreational management parameters: minimum size limit; bag limit; inter-season quota transfer limits; and in-season adjustment of season duration. We incorporated results of stated-preference angler surveys to produce a bioeconomic model for two case studies: Atlantic Florida red snapper, and central Oregon Pacific halibut. In maximizing long-term total utility, a strong trade-off between season length and retained daily catch was observed in both fisheries, arising from increased minimum size limits which lengthened fishing seasons but reduced daily retained catch. The optimal management policy across the combination of beneficial attributes was sensitive to assumptions of the curvature of utility functions, i.e. to the degree to which anglers value those attributes with diminishing marginal returns, but generally involved satisfying the strong stated preferences for increased angling opportunity.