Abstract
Nonnative species pose a threat to native biodiversity and can have immense impacts on biological communities, altering the function of ecosystems. How much value is at risk from high-impact invasive species, and which parameters determine variation in that value, constitutes critical knowledge for directing both management and research, but it is rarely available. We evaluated the value of the commercial shellfish harvest that is at risk in nearshore ecosystems of Puget Sound, Washington State, USA, from the invasive European green crab, Carcinus maenas. We assessed this value using a simple static ecological model combined with an economic model using data from Puget Sound's shellfish harvest and revenue and the relationship between C. maenas abundance and the consumption rate of shellfish. The model incorporates a range in C. maenas diet preference, calories consumed per year, and crab densities. C. maenas is likely to prey on commercially harvested hardshell clams, oysters, and mussels, which would likely reduce additional revenue from processing and distribution, and the number of jobs associated with these fisheries. The model results suggest possible revenue losses of these shellfish ranging from $1.03-23.8 million USD (2.8-64% losses), with additional processing and distrubution losses up to $17.6 million USD and 442 job positions each year associated with a range of plausible parameter values. The broad range of values reflects the uncertainty in key factors underlying impacts, factors that are highly variable across invaded regions and so not knowable a priori. However, future research evaluating species invasions can reduce the uncertainty of impacts by characterizing several key parameters: density of individuals, number of arrivals, predation and competition interactions, and economic impacts. This study therefore provides direction for research to inform more accurate estimates of value-at-risk, and suggests substantial motivation for strong measures to prevent, monitor, and manage the possible invasion of C. maenas.
Highlights
In coastal ecosystems, preventing and mitigating the spread and impacts of nonnative species has become a global priority[1,2]
With limited funds to manage and research coastal ecosystems, calculating the value-at-risk for areas not yet invaded may justify the allocation of resources to prevent, mitigate, or further understand invasive impacts[12,13]
Commercial shellfish harvest The baseline for total shellfish harvest in Puget Sound for 2009 for hardshell clams, oysters and mussels recorded by PacFIN55 was 6.05 million kg of shellfish, with a landed harvest value of $37.26 million USD (Table 1)
Summary
In coastal ecosystems, preventing and mitigating the spread and impacts of nonnative species has become a global priority[1,2]. While many nonnative species have little to no measurable impact on their invaded regions, a few have caused great economic and ecosystem harm[3,4]. I suggest a couple of changes to Paragraph 5: Firstly, the second last sentence does not make sense. Maybe change it to something like "For example, if early preventative efforts had been funded to prevent invasion of the rusty crayfish ..., $6 million USD in fisheries harvest revenue during the 30 years since invasion may have been protected. I suggest changing the word 'aligning' in the last sentence to something like 'prioritising'.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
