Abstract

The exploitation of mixed fisheries leads to trade-offs between fisheries rent, production (landings) and resource conservation because harvest rent cannot be optimized simultaneously for all species. Additionally, the exploitation of mixed fisheries by heterogeneous fleets complicates their management because of the necessity to allocate catch or effort quotas, under some criterion of efficiency or equitability. The allocation of fishing opportunities impacts directly on the availability of jobs in fisheries. To analyse the trade-offs between employment and profits in mixed fisheries, an optimization bioeconomic model was built for the three bottom-trawl fleet segments operating in the Catalonia demersal fishery (NW Mediterranean Sea). The fishery is subject to a multiannual management plan to align fishing effort with the fisheries mortality that would produce the maximum sustainable yield. The optimal effort allocation among the three fleet segments were compared subject to alternative fisheries management policies: (i) maximum sustainable yield, (ii) maximum economic yield, (iii) maximum labour remuneration, (iv) pretty good yield, and (v) equilibrium biomass larger than biomass at maximum sustainable yield, taking into account the multispecies nature of the fishery. The results show that all management policies provide higher profits than current. In the first three scenarios, high profitability can be made compatible with a lower number of better paid jobs, because the optimal allocation of effort in most scenarios would imply a reduction in the number of vessels. The results also show that the current number of vessels and effort distribution (which are the result of a historical process, rather than the results of a management strategy) are far from any optimum.

Highlights

  • The rational exploitation of mixed, or multispecies, fisheries leads inevitably to trade-offs between the quantity of landings, fisheries rent and resource conservation because harvest rates cannot be optimized simultaneously for all species, due to different biological productivity (Clark, 1990; Hilborn et al, 2012)

  • This study explores the trade-offs of optimal fishing effort allocation in a typical Mediterranean Sea demersal mixed fishery, the bottom trawl fishery of Catalonia, exploited by three fleet segments of different technical and economic characteristics using the modelling framework of Sgardeli et al (2019)

  • The biomass at equilibrium for the three stocks is shown in Fig. A.1 of the Appendix which shows that each stocks responds differently to the management policies under study, as could be expected from their different biology and current exploitation status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rational exploitation of mixed, or multispecies, fisheries leads inevitably to trade-offs between the quantity of landings, fisheries rent and resource conservation because harvest rates cannot be optimized simultaneously for all species, due to different biological productivity (Clark, 1990; Hilborn et al, 2012). It is well known that this optimum on biological grounds results in lower stock biomass and fisheries rent than the harvest rate producing the maximum economic yield (MEY) (Clark, 1990; Hilborn et al, 2012; Pascoe et al, 2015). The application of these single species management concepts to multispecies fisheries increases the difficulty of optimal management, because of different biological productivity of the different species, and because the existence of technical interactions that make it impossible to simultaneously achieve optimal harvest rates for all species (Paulik et al, 1967; Clark, 1990). Attempting to rebuild stock biomass levels as quickly as possible to pre-specified BMSY targets had a very high cost in socio economic terms (jobs and revenue lost) in the US West Coast groundfish mixed fishery (McQuaw et al, 2021), highlighting the trade-off between conservation and social and economic objectives

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.