Abstract

BackgroundEfflux is a widespread mechanism of reversible drug resistance in bacteria that can be triggered by environmental stressors, including many classes of drugs. While such chemicals when used alone are typically toxic to the cell, they can also induce the efflux of a broad range of agents and may therefore prove beneficial to cells in the presence of multiple stressors. The cellular response to a combination of such chemical stressors may be governed by a trade-off between the fitness costs due to drug toxicity and benefits mediated by inducible systems. Unfortunately, disentangling the cost-benefit interplay using measurements of bacterial growth in response to the competing effects of the drugs is not possible without the support of a theoretical framework.ResultsHere, we use the well-studied multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) system in E. coli to experimentally characterize the trade-off between drug toxicity (“cost”) and drug-induced resistance (“benefit”) mediated by efflux pumps. Specifically, we show that the combined effects of a MAR-inducing drug and an antibiotic are governed by a superposition of cost and benefit functions that govern these trade-offs. We find that this superposition holds for all drug concentrations, and it therefore allows us to describe the full dose–response diagram for a drug pair using simpler cost and benefit functions. Moreover, this framework predicts the existence of optimal growth at a non-trivial concentration of inducer. We demonstrate that optimal growth does not coincide with maximum induction of the mar promoter, but instead results from the interplay between drug toxicity and mar induction. Finally, we derived and experimentally validated a general phase diagram highlighting the role of these opposing effects in shaping the interaction between two drugs.ConclusionsOur analysis provides a quantitative description of the MAR system and highlights the trade-off between inducible resistance and the toxicity of the inducing agent in a multi-component environment. The results provide a predictive framework for the combined effects of drug toxicity and induction of the MAR system that are usually masked by bulk measurements of bacterial growth. The framework may also be useful for identifying optimal growth conditions in more general systems where combinations of environmental cues contribute to both transient resistance and toxicity.

Highlights

  • Efflux is a widespread mechanism of reversible drug resistance in bacteria that can be triggered by environmental stressors, including many classes of drugs

  • Here we study inducible resistance mediated by the multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) system

  • Experimental characterization of salicylate-induced antibiotic resistance To study the trade-off between drug toxicity and induced resistance, we first measured the effects of salicylate and two protein synthesis inhibitors, chloramphenicol and tetracycline, on cell growth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Efflux is a widespread mechanism of reversible drug resistance in bacteria that can be triggered by environmental stressors, including many classes of drugs While such chemicals when used alone are typically toxic to the cell, they can induce the efflux of a broad range of agents and may prove beneficial to cells in the presence of multiple stressors. While a large number of studies have focused on mutation-driven resistance, recent attention has shifted to transient, or “inducible”, drug resistance taking place on much shorter timescales [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] This transient resistance does not rely on mutations, but can be induced by a large class of chemicals commonly found in drugs (e.g. antibiotics and painkillers) and food preservatives. They raise an interesting question: do trade-offs between drug toxicity and resistance play a role in inducible drug resistance? when cells are exposed a combination of toxic agents that potentially induce transient resistance, how are these trade-offs related to synergy or antagonism between the given agents?

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call