Abstract
CONTEXTThe accessibility and availability of forages is a common concern in crop-livestock systems in West Africa; however, options to increase forage production may entail trade-offs within the farm system that can be challenging to quantify explicitly. OBJECTIVEThis study examined how maize (Zea mays L.) leaf stripping affected maize and sheep productivity and associated labour requirements, and farm system trade-offs and synergies in four communities in the Northern Region of Ghana. METHODSMaize leaf stripping involved removing almost senesced leaves from maize plants below the cob level at silking. We combined data from three sources: on-farm maize trials with 28 farmers from two seasons (2017 and 2018), on-farm sheep feeding trials where the pasture-based diets of weaner sheep were supplemented with stripped maize leaves fed in pens (conducted in 2019), and farm survey data from 117 households (conducted in 2014), seven of which were in the on-farm maize trials and owned sheep. We examined the trial data using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONSMaize leaf stripping had no significant effect on maize grain yield but had a significant positive effect on maize forage protein yield from leaf and stover. Offering maize leaves to weaner sheep had a significant positive effect on average daily liveweight gain, estimated marginal mean was 29.3 g with maize leaves and −10.9 g without maize leaves. For the maize-sheep systems of the seven households, non-inferential statistics suggested that on average maize leaf stripping reduced total maize grain production by 12% (range −46 to 38) and increased maize forage protein production from leaf and stover by 90% (range −16 to 298). Stripping the maize leaves from one hectare of land took an extra 34 h (range 27 to 42) of labour, which was counterbalanced by reduced labour time for grazing as sheep were fed the maize leaves in pens. For the 117 farmers, heterogeneity in maize areas planted and livestock numbers resulted in heterogeneous production and labour effects of maize leaf stripping. Farmers qualitatively described how maize leaf stripping released labour so children could spend more time at school rather than shepherding. SIGNIFICANCEWe quantified in northern Ghana how maize leaf stripping altered crop and livestock productivity and associated trade-offs and synergies in the farm system, including labour. Changes in crop management often have implications beyond the crop's field and examining these implications can provide insights into the suitability of alternative farm management options.
Highlights
Understanding the dynamics in farm systems that produce and alter the nature of trade-offs is central to achieving a sustainable and food-secure future (Klapwijk et al, 2014; Kanter et al, 2018)
We studied the effect of maize leaf stripping on productivity, pro duction, and labour requirements within farm systems in the Northern Region of Ghana
Our analysis showed that maize leaf stripping tended to have more positive interactions than negative interactions with the performance of the farm system
Summary
Understanding the dynamics in farm systems that produce and alter the nature of trade-offs (defined as exchanges that occur as compro mises) is central to achieving a sustainable and food-secure future (Klapwijk et al, 2014; Kanter et al, 2018) These trade-offs typically occur because a change in farm management influences what must be done in one cropping field or grazing area and may involve com promises and situational decisions with other activities from which farmers generate their livelihood. One hypothesis is that maize leaf stripping increases maize grain yield when the removed leaves are becoming senescent and have low photosynthetic capac ity These leaves, when they remain on the plant under low incident Photosynthetically Active Radiation, would conceivably become net importers of assimilates in competition with the developing cob.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.