Abstract
Abstract This paper analyzes the extent to which tax differences affect the use of trade credit. U.S.-owned affiliates in low-tax countries use trade credit to lend, whereas those in high-tax countries use trade credit to borrow: 10% lower local tax rates are associated with net trade credit positions that are 1.4% higher as a fraction of sales. The use of trade credit to get capital out of low-tax, low-return environments is also illustrated by the temporary repatriation tax holiday in 2005, which was used most intensively by affiliates with positive net trade credit positions.
Highlights
BUSINESS transactions are commonly conducted on the basis of credit, as a result of which a seller does not receive cash but instead the promise of a future payment, which it records as an account receivable, and a buyer incurs an obligation, which it records as an account payable
Petersen and Rajan (1997) note that lower-income firms, despite their limited liquidity and high monitoring costs, are more likely than others to lend to unrelated parties via trade credit
One reason may be that lower-income firms, with their greater likelihood of tax losses, in expectation face lower marginal tax rates than others and might find it profitable to use trade credit to reallocate capital to firms with higher tax rates and higher pretax marginal products of capital
Summary
"Trade Credit and Taxes." Review of Economics and Statistics 98, no.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.