Abstract
In the cross section of countries, there is a strong positive correlation between trade andincome, and a negative relationship between trade and inequality. Does this reflect a causalrelationship? We adopt the Frankel and Romer (1999) identification strategy, and exploitcountries' exogenous geographic characteristics to estimate the causal effect of trade onincome and inequality. Our cross-country estimates for trade's impact on real income areconsistently positive and significant over time. At the same time, we do not find anystatistical evidence that more trade increases aggregate measures of income inequality.Heeding previous concerns in the literature (e.g. Rodriguez and Rodrik, 2001; Rodrik,Subramanian and Trebbi, 2004), we carefully analyze the validity of our geography-basedinstrument, and confirm that the IV estimates for the impact of trade are not driven by otherdirect or indirect effects of geography through non-trade channels.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
