Tracking the follow-up of work in progress papers

Omar Mubin,Abdullah Al Mahmud,Mudassar Arsalan

doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2631-4

Omar Mubin, Abdullah Al Mahmud + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2631-4

Copy DOI

Abstract

Academic conferences offer numerous submission tracks to support the inclusion of a variety of researchers and topics. Work in progress papers are one such submission type where authors present preliminary results in a poster session. They have recently gained popularity in the area of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) as a relatively easier pathway to attending the conference due to their higher acceptance rate as compared to the main tracks. However, it is not clear if these work in progress papers are further extended or transitioned into more complete and thorough full papers or are simply one-off pieces of research. In order to answer this we explore self-citation patterns of four work in progress editions in two popular HCI conferences (CHI2010, CHI2011, HRI2010 and HRI2011). Our results show that almost 50% of the work in progress papers do not have any self-citations and approximately only half of the self-citations can be considered as true extensions of the original work in progress paper. Specific conferences dominate as the preferred venue where extensions of these work in progress papers are published. Furthermore, the rate of self-citations peaks in the immediate year after publication and gradually tails off. By tracing author publication records, we also delve into possible reasons of work in progress papers not being cited in follow up publications. In conclusion, we speculate on the main trends observed and what they may mean looking ahead for the work in progress track of premier HCI conferences.

Highlights

Conferences, symposiums and workshops are one of the primary means of disseminating research and presenting state of the art results (Lisee et al 2008)
Our results show that almost 50% of the work in progress papers do not have any self-citations and approximately only half of the self-citations can be considered as true extensions of the original work in progress paper
Most papers are expected to have a future work section (Hu and Wan 2015) but in the case of these work in progress papers does this future work really ever transpire? In this paper, we present our findings from an empirical study where we delved into the work in progress papers from four separate conference editions in the area of Human Computer Interaction to determine their follow up by recording their self-citations and type of follow up extensions

Summary

Introduction

Conferences, symposiums and workshops are one of the primary means of disseminating research and presenting state of the art results (Lisee et al 2008). Most full paper presentations are oral and other modes of presentation such as short papers are witnessed depending on the content of the conference. These include shorter oral talks, demos, video presentations, poster presentations and more. Do conferences allow for discussion of latest findings and provide networking opportunities for attendees. Discussions held in such a platform allow researchers to explore collaborations and avenues of extending their presented work. Attending conferences is an integral component of the professional duties of researchers and academics alike

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion